I'm saddened to cast a No vote for this because I want to see more LatAm builders grow in the onchian economy. Unfortunately, this prop represents many of the factors that led ecosystems like Gitcoin, Optimism and others to eliminate education and regional efforts from their grant funding.

Although this team has been sharing Nouns related information for a long time, it is not done in am effective or impactful way. Most of the Twitter content is simple retweets that look like there's engagement, but that's the engagement from the content origin - not this teams audience.

These concerns were discussed several times, including the recent Nouncil call. The response "reach is noy impact" doesn't make sense to me because that's their goal - reach and retain a captive audience in the Spanish speaking community.

Impressions on Twitter are not an effective way to measure this teams success in attracting more interest and builders to Nouns. This is mostly bots - not real humans with an interest in Nouns.

We as a DAO need to avoid getting finnessed with buzz words like "education" and "onboarding".

Funding this prop setsa precedent for low effort/ low impact work and positions this team for a follow up prop in early 2025 to proactively fund more of this.

I'm an advocate for supporting builders from emerging markets, but these resources must be allocated based on impact - not the emerging market card.

I don't believe this team has put forth sufficient effort or yielded identifiable impact for the Nouniverse to justify this spend.

I was not aware of Artxie Prop house grant and lack of updates. This raises another red flag for me.

I would welcome another LatAm team doing work for Nouns in the region because it could result in a representation of the region's diversity and provide pluralistic impact and participation funnels.

For now, we should support our winners in the region and help them expand on their work.

My vote does not represent a conflict of interest because I am not a part of Nouns Amigos.

I'm saddened to cast a No vote for this because I want to see more LatAm builders grow in the onchian economy. Unfortunately, this prop represents many of the factors that led ecosystems like Gitcoin, Optimism and others to eliminate education and regional efforts from their grant funding.

Although this team has been sharing Nouns related information for a long time, it is not done in am effective or impactful way. Most of the Twitter content is simple retweets that look like there's engagement, but that's the engagement from the content origin - not this teams audience.

These concerns were discussed several times, including the recent Nouncil call. The response "reach is noy impact" doesn't make sense to me because that's their goal - reach and retain a captive audience in the Spanish speaking community.

Impressions on Twitter are not an effective way to measure this teams success in attracting more interest and builders to Nouns. This is mostly bots - not real humans with an interest in Nouns.

We as a DAO need to avoid getting finnessed with buzz words like "education" and "onboarding".

Funding this prop setsa precedent for low effort/ low impact work and positions this team for a follow up prop in early 2025 to proactively fund more of this.

I'm an advocate for supporting builders from emerging markets, but these resources must be allocated based on impact - not the emerging market card.

I don't believe this team has put forth sufficient effort or yielded identifiable impact for the Nouniverse to justify this spend.

I was not aware of Artxie Prop house grant and lack of updates. This raises another red flag for me.

I would welcome another LatAm team doing work for Nouns in the region because it could result in a representation of the region's diversity and provide pluralistic impact and participation funnels.

For now, we should support our winners in the region and help them expand on their work.

My vote does not represent a conflict of interest because I am not a part of Nouns Amigos.

I'm saddened to cast a No vote for this because I want to see more LatAm builders grow in the onchian economy. Unfortunately, this prop represents many of the factors that led ecosystems like Gitcoin, Optimism and others to eliminate education and regional efforts from their grant funding.

Although this team has been sharing Nouns related information for a long time, it is not done in am effective or impactful way. Most of the Twitter content is simple retweets that look like there's engagement, but that's the engagement from the content origin - not this teams audience.

These concerns were discussed several times, including the recent Nouncil call. The response "reach is noy impact" doesn't make sense to me because that's their goal - reach and retain a captive audience in the Spanish speaking community.

Impressions on Twitter are not an effective way to measure this teams success in attracting more interest and builders to Nouns. This is mostly bots - not real humans with an interest in Nouns.

We as a DAO need to avoid getting finnessed with buzz words like "education" and "onboarding".

Funding this prop setsa precedent for low effort/ low impact work and positions this team for a follow up prop in early 2025 to proactively fund more of this.

I'm an advocate for supporting builders from emerging markets, but these resources must be allocated based on impact - not the emerging market card.

I don't believe this team has put forth sufficient effort or yielded identifiable impact for the Nouniverse to justify this spend.

I was not aware of Artxie Prop house grant and lack of updates. This raises another red flag for me.

I would welcome another LatAm team doing work for Nouns in the region because it could result in a representation of the region's diversity and provide pluralistic impact and participation funnels.

For now, we should support our winners in the region and help them expand on their work.

My vote does not represent a conflict of interest because I am not a part of Nouns Amigos.

I'm saddened to cast a No vote for this because I want to see more LatAm builders grow in the onchian economy. Unfortunately, this prop represents many of the factors that led ecosystems like Gitcoin, Optimism and others to eliminate education and regional efforts from their grant funding.

Although this team has been sharing Nouns related information for a long time, it is not done in am effective or impactful way. Most of the Twitter content is simple retweets that look like there's engagement, but that's the engagement from the content origin - not this teams audience.

These concerns were discussed several times, including the recent Nouncil call. The response "reach is noy impact" doesn't make sense to me because that's their goal - reach and retain a captive audience in the Spanish speaking community.

Impressions on Twitter are not an effective way to measure this teams success in attracting more interest and builders to Nouns. This is mostly bots - not real humans with an interest in Nouns.

We as a DAO need to avoid getting finnessed with buzz words like "education" and "onboarding".

Funding this prop setsa precedent for low effort/ low impact work and positions this team for a follow up prop in early 2025 to proactively fund more of this.

I'm an advocate for supporting builders from emerging markets, but these resources must be allocated based on impact - not the emerging market card.

I don't believe this team has put forth sufficient effort or yielded identifiable impact for the Nouniverse to justify this spend.

I was not aware of Artxie Prop house grant and lack of updates. This raises another red flag for me.

I would welcome another LatAm team doing work for Nouns in the region because it could result in a representation of the region's diversity and provide pluralistic impact and participation funnels.

For now, we should support our winners in the region and help them expand on their work.

My vote does not represent a conflict of interest because I am not a part of Nouns Amigos.

I'm saddened to cast a No vote for this because I want to see more LatAm builders grow in the onchian economy. Unfortunately, this prop represents many of the factors that led ecosystems like Gitcoin, Optimism and others to eliminate education and regional efforts from their grant funding.

Although this team has been sharing Nouns related information for a long time, it is not done in am effective or impactful way. Most of the Twitter content is simple retweets that look like there's engagement, but that's the engagement from the content origin - not this teams audience.

These concerns were discussed several times, including the recent Nouncil call. The response "reach is noy impact" doesn't make sense to me because that's their goal - reach and retain a captive audience in the Spanish speaking community.

Impressions on Twitter are not an effective way to measure this teams success in attracting more interest and builders to Nouns. This is mostly bots - not real humans with an interest in Nouns.

We as a DAO need to avoid getting finnessed with buzz words like "education" and "onboarding".

Funding this prop setsa precedent for low effort/ low impact work and positions this team for a follow up prop in early 2025 to proactively fund more of this.

I'm an advocate for supporting builders from emerging markets, but these resources must be allocated based on impact - not the emerging market card.

I don't believe this team has put forth sufficient effort or yielded identifiable impact for the Nouniverse to justify this spend.

I was not aware of Artxie Prop house grant and lack of updates. This raises another red flag for me.

I would welcome another LatAm team doing work for Nouns in the region because it could result in a representation of the region's diversity and provide pluralistic impact and participation funnels.

For now, we should support our winners in the region and help them expand on their work.

My vote does not represent a conflict of interest because I am not a part of Nouns Amigos.

I'm saddened to cast a No vote for this because I want to see more LatAm builders grow in the onchian economy. Unfortunately, this prop represents many of the factors that led ecosystems like Gitcoin, Optimism and others to eliminate education and regional efforts from their grant funding.

Although this team has been sharing Nouns related information for a long time, it is not done in am effective or impactful way. Most of the Twitter content is simple retweets that look like there's engagement, but that's the engagement from the content origin - not this teams audience.

These concerns were discussed several times, including the recent Nouncil call. The response "reach is noy impact" doesn't make sense to me because that's their goal - reach and retain a captive audience in the Spanish speaking community.

Impressions on Twitter are not an effective way to measure this teams success in attracting more interest and builders to Nouns. This is mostly bots - not real humans with an interest in Nouns.

We as a DAO need to avoid getting finnessed with buzz words like "education" and "onboarding".

Funding this prop setsa precedent for low effort/ low impact work and positions this team for a follow up prop in early 2025 to proactively fund more of this.

I'm an advocate for supporting builders from emerging markets, but these resources must be allocated based on impact - not the emerging market card.

I don't believe this team has put forth sufficient effort or yielded identifiable impact for the Nouniverse to justify this spend.

I was not aware of Artxie Prop house grant and lack of updates. This raises another red flag for me.

I would welcome another LatAm team doing work for Nouns in the region because it could result in a representation of the region's diversity and provide pluralistic impact and participation funnels.

For now, we should support our winners in the region and help them expand on their work.

My vote does not represent a conflict of interest because I am not a part of Nouns Amigos.

I'm saddened to cast a No vote for this because I want to see more LatAm builders grow in the onchian economy. Unfortunately, this prop represents many of the factors that led ecosystems like Gitcoin, Optimism and others to eliminate education and regional efforts from their grant funding.

Although this team has been sharing Nouns related information for a long time, it is not done in am effective or impactful way. Most of the Twitter content is simple retweets that look like there's engagement, but that's the engagement from the content origin - not this teams audience.

These concerns were discussed several times, including the recent Nouncil call. The response "reach is noy impact" doesn't make sense to me because that's their goal - reach and retain a captive audience in the Spanish speaking community.

Impressions on Twitter are not an effective way to measure this teams success in attracting more interest and builders to Nouns. This is mostly bots - not real humans with an interest in Nouns.

We as a DAO need to avoid getting finnessed with buzz words like "education" and "onboarding".

Funding this prop setsa precedent for low effort/ low impact work and positions this team for a follow up prop in early 2025 to proactively fund more of this.

I'm an advocate for supporting builders from emerging markets, but these resources must be allocated based on impact - not the emerging market card.

I don't believe this team has put forth sufficient effort or yielded identifiable impact for the Nouniverse to justify this spend.

I was not aware of Artxie Prop house grant and lack of updates. This raises another red flag for me.

I would welcome another LatAm team doing work for Nouns in the region because it could result in a representation of the region's diversity and provide pluralistic impact and participation funnels.

For now, we should support our winners in the region and help them expand on their work.

My vote does not represent a conflict of interest because I am not a part of Nouns Amigos.

I'm saddened to cast a No vote for this because I want to see more LatAm builders grow in the onchian economy. Unfortunately, this prop represents many of the factors that led ecosystems like Gitcoin, Optimism and others to eliminate education and regional efforts from their grant funding.

Although this team has been sharing Nouns related information for a long time, it is not done in am effective or impactful way. Most of the Twitter content is simple retweets that look like there's engagement, but that's the engagement from the content origin - not this teams audience.

These concerns were discussed several times, including the recent Nouncil call. The response "reach is noy impact" doesn't make sense to me because that's their goal - reach and retain a captive audience in the Spanish speaking community.

Impressions on Twitter are not an effective way to measure this teams success in attracting more interest and builders to Nouns. This is mostly bots - not real humans with an interest in Nouns.

We as a DAO need to avoid getting finnessed with buzz words like "education" and "onboarding".

Funding this prop setsa precedent for low effort/ low impact work and positions this team for a follow up prop in early 2025 to proactively fund more of this.

I'm an advocate for supporting builders from emerging markets, but these resources must be allocated based on impact - not the emerging market card.

I don't believe this team has put forth sufficient effort or yielded identifiable impact for the Nouniverse to justify this spend.

I was not aware of Artxie Prop house grant and lack of updates. This raises another red flag for me.

I would welcome another LatAm team doing work for Nouns in the region because it could result in a representation of the region's diversity and provide pluralistic impact and participation funnels.

For now, we should support our winners in the region and help them expand on their work.

My vote does not represent a conflict of interest because I am not a part of Nouns Amigos.