TLDR: Asking to continue our engagement with nouns for another 12 months.
Below are some of the things we’re proud of that came into fruition since this term started.
The fork mechanism has been used 3 times so far. To the best of our knowledge, it worked smoothly with no hiccups. This is the most significant and risky change to the Nouns protocol to date and we are happy there were no technical issues.
A new way to coordinate onchain at the pre-proposal stage. Over 100 candidates have been created so far, and over 40 proposals were created with signers via proposeBySigs
.
We believe this widened the funnel of proposals coming into the DAO and created a space where proposers can get attention, feedback and sponsorship.
The ability to update a proposal before voting starts is a simple change but seems to have been very useful.
We’ve been more actively publishing long form content on our mirror page in an effort to increase alignment and context on the work we’re doing.
Our first few months were dedicated to things related to the ongoing forks and arbitrage problem. This has pushed back our planned projects, but we think it was important for us to be reactive to the DAO’s needs.
This work included:
We are currently focused on two big projects that we want to ship in the next term:
Other projects that we will potentially work on:
As we did in this term, we will respond to the DAO critical or time sensitive needs as they come up.
In this proposal we are asking for a 12-month stream. We think we’ve established enough trust to try a longer stream so that we can spend less time worrying about the next proposal, and more time shipping.
We still think shorter streams are essential to mitigate the DAO’s risk with new builders, and hope the DAO will continue with that standard, while being open to longer stream experiments with trusted community members.
In addition, we’re committing to posting propdates every 3 months with a status report of what has been done and what is currently being worked on; your feedback is meaningful and often helps us make better decisions.
The rest of the terms are similar to our previous proposals.
TLDR: Asking to continue our engagement with nouns for another 12 months.
Below are some of the things we’re proud of that came into fruition since this term started.
The fork mechanism has been used 3 times so far. To the best of our knowledge, it worked smoothly with no hiccups. This is the most significant and risky change to the Nouns protocol to date and we are happy there were no technical issues.
A new way to coordinate onchain at the pre-proposal stage. Over 100 candidates have been created so far, and over 40 proposals were created with signers via proposeBySigs
.
We believe this widened the funnel of proposals coming into the DAO and created a space where proposers can get attention, feedback and sponsorship.
The ability to update a proposal before voting starts is a simple change but seems to have been very useful.
We’ve been more actively publishing long form content on our mirror page in an effort to increase alignment and context on the work we’re doing.
Our first few months were dedicated to things related to the ongoing forks and arbitrage problem. This has pushed back our planned projects, but we think it was important for us to be reactive to the DAO’s needs.
This work included:
We are currently focused on two big projects that we want to ship in the next term:
Other projects that we will potentially work on:
As we did in this term, we will respond to the DAO critical or time sensitive needs as they come up.
In this proposal we are asking for a 12-month stream. We think we’ve established enough trust to try a longer stream so that we can spend less time worrying about the next proposal, and more time shipping.
We still think shorter streams are essential to mitigate the DAO’s risk with new builders, and hope the DAO will continue with that standard, while being open to longer stream experiments with trusted community members.
In addition, we’re committing to posting propdates every 3 months with a status report of what has been done and what is currently being worked on; your feedback is meaningful and often helps us make better decisions.
The rest of the terms are similar to our previous proposals.