Proposal votes
Activity
While I’m 100% ‘for’ sending the remaining payment to Dustin (the art rocks!) and think this NEEDS to happen since it was part of Prop 48 - which passed - I don’t understand what NAC has to do with either Prop 48 or this one.
Most likely something I (or other new nouners) don’t know about the context around it, but seems like that reasoning either needs to be explained here in the prop or broken out into a separate one.
I think this should be resubmitted for more clarity and so that Dustin can be paid ASAP.
While I’m 100% ‘for’ sending the remaining payment to Dustin (the art rocks!) and think this NEEDS to happen since it was part of Prop 48 - which passed - I don’t understand what NAC has to do with either Prop 48 or this one.
Most likely something I (or other new nouners) don’t know about the context around it, but seems like that reasoning either needs to be explained here in the prop or broken out into a separate one.
I think this should be resubmitted for more clarity and so that Dustin can be paid ASAP.
Following through on commitments is important. This sends a signal to the community that agreements with DAOs can be trusted.
sent from voter.wtf
I sympathize with concerns over the format of this prop. I do think in this particular instance with the circumstances as they are, it's sufficient to OK this one as a special case.
sent from voter.wtf
(noun 40 voting via agora proxy)
while I agree with the criticisms about the prop bundling different intents being not ideal, I feel dustin yellin promptly getting paid for their incredible work delivered is higher priority.
FOR - 37 VOTES
AGAINST - 4 VOTES
eltonpenguin | "I prefer 327"
supertightwoody | "Need more clarity in this proposal. I'm not sure how/why everyone is voting yes for this when it's extremely unclear what the tx and final deliverables are."
ABSTAINS - 6 VOTES
sent from voter.wtf
reVoteWithReason from wilsoncusack.eth
This proposal is very confusing and should be cancelled and resubmitted as multiple proposals.
- Mandate NAC send Noun 252 to Dustin Yellin Studio
- Request DAO send 50 ETH to Dustin Yellin Studio (NAC does not exist as some fallback protection for proposers to get promised funds from DAO)
- Dissolve NAC (? That seems to be the subtext here, but it's not clear.)
sent from voter.wtf
sent from voter.wtf
This proposal is very confusing and should be cancelled and resubmitted as multiple proposals.
- Mandate NAC send Noun 252 to Dustin Yellin Studio
- Request DAO send 50 ETH to Dustin Yellin Studio (NAC does not exist as some fallback protection for proposers to get promised funds from DAO)
- Dissolve NAC (? That seems to be the subtext here, but it's not clear.)
sent from voter.wtf
Very much in favor of 1. We do what we say we will do.
2 and 3 should be separate proposals. NAC shouldn't be paying Dustin ETH, it's not why it exists.
Voting yes out of principle.
As a DAO, we must honor our previous commitments or else a lot of what Nouns fundamentally stands for around proliferation and 'paying it forward' breaks down.
Voting yes because, on principle, the DAO should follow through on its offchain commitments that it makes to contributors who fulfill the conditions for those commitments.
And I think the actual sculpture that Dustin Yellin made was fantastic and he deserves to be compensated accordingly!
sent from voter.wtf
reVoteWithReason from max-power.eth
cuz its awesome
sent from voter.wtf