No need to give up this source of revenue with no clear upside.

i think it's beneficial for both projects if the reward continues as specified at the outset of lilnouns

Prop 210: NO WINS

18 Yes, 22 No, 3 Abstain

9 Nouncillors abstained from the decision

Vote Reasons & Discussion

lilpizza.eth | "Nouns is not using these tokens and doesn't seem to currently have plans to participate in Lil Nouns governance. This would be a huge benefit for Lil Nouns as it would allow the DAO to be more self-sustaining by rewarding contributors with these tokens."

Classic_Craig | "I'm fond of Lil Nouns and if this allows them to do giveaways and other building things, I'm for it!"

vsvsvs | "This is the beginning of something dangerous..."

Mach | "sure if that's what they want"

.ZllW ⌐◨-◨ | "A complete sever of r/s between Lil Nouns and Nouns is not ideal; would like to see a re-proposal where Lil Nouns request for 10% of the Lil Nouns currently in Nouns Treasury to help fund/reward Lil builders instead"

RyanMac ⌐◨-◨ | "After reading the prop 210 discord channel in the Jungle & feedback from Nouners: this looks like death by suicide for lil nouns with the DAO"

0xDariush | "Nouns should keep increasing their lils during the time and also start using their vote powers to help lils to move better."

Mindtoasted | "I vote no in this, I just dont find a good reason for this."

For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil

I generally support using some of the lil nouns in our treasury to help the lils! We have not demonstrated any intent to use or sell them, so to the extent where they can help lils proliferate the meme. i'd be all for it!

However, totally severing the relationship with Nouns doesn't seem like the right way to do this.

A deal is a deal

Hopeful we can find better alternatives

We are now on DAY 5 of 'Jacob-gate'. Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig?

I would be supportive of using some percentage of our lil nouns treasury to support lil nouns builders (for example 10% of our holding would be ~70 lil nouns), but ending the emissions entirely feels a bit abrupt and I'm not sure if it's something that has broad support from the lil nouns community? (proplot signaling feels somewhat weak for a prop of this magnitude). If a formal onchain vote had passed on lil nouns dao to put this prop up then I would definitely have considered more strongly.

No reason to do this.

We don't need to cut Noun's reward entirely to achieve our goal of getting more lil noun tokens to use as comp to fund builders/proliferators. Voting no and hoping to get a new prop up to specifically request lil noun tokens the DAO already holds instead of cutting the reward completely.